This is a post by guest author, KRG. KRG is a senior executive in the financial services industry in India. He heads the treasury function of a leading financial institution and prefers to identify himself solely by his initials. The post is his reflection on the measures announced during the presentation of India’s annual budget by the Finance Minister, P Chidambaram (PC).
I was told that a lot of people were expecting a populist budget; and one was kind of prepared for it. But as the budget speech progressed, I started getting a feeling that the underlying tone is not quite normal and certainly not expected of PC. I will list out the things that stood out for me:
- Growth is given; our job is to make it is inclusive (the smug part…).
- Futures in wheat and rice are banned (An expert committee will now review the future of commodity futures… FM says that FMC banned this and that he will go by expert recommendations… Already there are arguments on what caused the fall in some of the agri-prices; market men seem to suggest that the price action is in tune with delivery expectations while authorities claim credit through the ban…… Voila, we have a new control measure on inflation… ban futures and primary prices will fall. When they fall too much we can reintroduce trading again).
- Fiscal deficit contained as per targets (but wait, this is only in percentage terms; actual numbers show slippage despite very strong tax collections mainly on account of non-plan expenditure…. And we thought that the reformist and clean PM/FM combine has started getting a hang on how to control expenditures especially the non-planned variety).
- MAT made applicable for IT sector. Whatever happened to the Tax-holiday till 2009? Or is it something else?
- ESOPs are now part of FBT. There seems to be lot of confusion on how this is going to be implemented. My view is that on the difference between option exercise price and Fair Market Value at the time of option exercise (FMV), the company will pay FBT and employee will pay capital gains tax on the difference between FMV and the sale price. Again, the principle that a capital asset will be taxed differentially seems little unpalatable. If the idea is that employee will pay capital gain on full amount (i.e. between sale price and exercise price) and company will separately pay FBT on the difference between FMV and exercise price, then this gets even more confusing. Tax a benefit which is being taxed separately anyways….We have new defining Fiscal Paradigms.
- Cement: This takes the cake…..; Dual taxation to control inflation… It is a separate and mute point that the prices actually went up. It is a separate point again that this opens up issues like what is the right cost, quality, margin etc. The more important point is why the logic cannot be extended to others. All manufacturing inflation can be nipped at the source. Lay down specific prices for all inputs as well. And introduce multi-layered taxation for excise and extend the concept to customs duty etc. Yet another defining Fiscal Paradigm that fits the ultra new inclusive-growth-oriented-anti-inflationary-yet-market-determined economic system. Sounds more like the return to command economy
It is quite possible that I got all this wrong or am seeing too much into too little and would therefore love to be corrected. Especially since the present PM/FM combine is easily the most market-friendly set-up that we have got so far and how we hate to lose them to some contrived and contorted economic and fiscal logic