Intelligentguess

Analysis of Market Economics

December 13th, 2007

Alan Greenspan - The chutzpah!!!

Alan Greenspan has written an article in the Wall Street Journal on the ongoing mortgage crisis in America.

In it, he lays the blame for the crisis on almost everything else (including the collapse of the Soviet union) but for his own actions of keeping rates too low for too long as the Fed Chairman, even at times expressing helplessness.

Read this excerpt for an example

There was clearly little the world’s central banks could do to temper this most recent surge in human euphoria, in some ways reminiscent of the Dutch Tulip craze of the 17th century and South Sea Bubble of the 18th century.

There is a clear unwillingness to take responsibility for the consequences of the Fed’s actions (or should I say inactions). I would tend to agree with Mark Thoma who at the end of this post says

Was the crisis his fault? I wouldn’t go that far. Could he have done more to prevent it or reduce its severity? Here I think the answer is yes.

While Greenspan laments the lack of control that central banks had on long term interest rates, most of the crisis has been caused by loans taken on very low adjustable rate mortgages (ARM) which in turn fueled a rise in asset prices to bubble type levels. ARMs are marked to short term interest rates, which have a more or less direct relationship to central bank policy action.

On this count too, the maestro seems to have got it wrong.

Finally, the punchline is delivered by Paul Krugman who says that

He once described Greenspan like a man who suggests leaving the barn door ajar, and then - after the horse is gone - delivers a lecture on the importance of keeping your animals properly locked up.

December 8th, 2007

Adams Square Funding - RIP : From AAA to zilch in a year

First there was Carina

Now, Adams Square Funding I Ltd - A Credit Suisse managed hybrid CDO has gone into liquidation recently (Bloomberg Report).

Further discussions at FT Alphaville and Calculated Risk show that even holders of AAA securities under the said CDO received nothing. Notable is the fact that this CDO was originated just a year ago.

So, it took all of one year for the highest rated securities to go into default. This must be one of the fastest moves from AAA to D. (though S&P had been putting such structures on rating watch - that’s no solace however for investors who believed in the ability of the rating folks to assess credit risk)

Soundly illustrates the power that rating agencies had begun to command and the lack of homework or due diligence being done by investors.

A lesson in all this is - if you can’t understand it do not invest in it. Did someone say Caveat Emptor.

November 12th, 2007

Carina CDO downgrades - A Lesson for all

So, State Street (the manager) has begun liquidating securities held by the Carina CDO.

Consequently the rating agency has to downgrade the senior classes (rated AAA earlier) by as much as 18 notches (to CCC- in some cases).

Yup - You read it right - 18 notches in one go. What’s more the rating agency says that if the process of liquidation is halted, the ratings of some of the classes of securities would have to be lowered even further.

So much for all the fancy packaging and repackaging and the redistribution of risk.

When liquidity dries up, everything goes for a toss. That fat tail that we  keep ignoring.

I remember my days of fund management when fancy investment bankers would tout the virtues of having a core illiquid portfolio to improve gains (yield pick up is the jargon they would use) and all my talk on the virtues of liquidity (especially in a completely illiquid market like that in India) would be laughed at and jeered.

I was never very popular with these bankers. After all they used to make a multiple of what I used to - for selling us (the fund managers) all that junk while preaching sound risk management techniques at the same time.

Well, the lessons from the mature markets are there for all of us to learn.

PS : It needs to be clarified that State Street only manages the portfolio. It is not an investor in the CDO. Hence it does not face a loss due to the liquidation or downgrade of the securities. Ultimate investors (unknown to us) in the CDO would be the ones worst hit. This would include dealers like the investment banks, hedge funds etc.

November 7th, 2007

An exercise in futility …..

The US Dollar gets into a free fall against most other assets after a Chinese official hints at diversifying deployment of reserves into stronger currencies

I could go on and on….

Amidst all this we see some evidence of decoupling

The Australian Central Bank raised interest rates today. The ECB is expected to maintain a hawkish stance on monetary policy
Amidst all this the Reserve Bank of India has announced that it has loaded up on more ammunition to defend the Indian Rupee against the deluge of dollar flows. The ceiling for issuance of Market Stabilisation (or MSS) bonds has been raised to INR 2.5 trn. That’s almost two times the gross yearly government borrowing (in other words the fiscal deficit).

It’s time they realise that such measures only add to the flows, emboldening potential investors of the near surety that the currency would not depreciate. In addition it allows them to test the limits of the abilities of the central bankers in managing these flows.

It’s time RBI realises that these measures are an exercise in futility.

Remember the “Impossible Trinity“.

November 1st, 2007
September 28th, 2007

Of Misbah, misbehaviour and messiahs

This is a piece I wrote that has been published in DNA.

The published piece has a few minor edits.

The full piece is reproduced below

Mervyn King, the Bank of England chief has had a tough few weeks.  Critics have decried his lack of timely action leading to the bailout situation with Northern Rock. On the other side of the Atlantic, Ben Bernanke has done more to cheer marketmen than anyone else. He too has his critics though. Many consider his rate cutting action as providing a lifeline to large American financial firms, considered amongst the most irresponsible in the world.

Noted investment guru, Jim Rogers has gone to the extent of calling the decision makers at the Fed clowns. Had Bernanke not done what he did, he would have faced the wrath of another Jim, the loquacious Cramer of CNBC and “thestreet.com”. Either way, there are both critics and backers.

So how do you decide if the decision is good or not, especially if the decision is that of a bailout as it seemed to be in the case of Northern Rock.  Noted Economist Larry Summers has defended bailouts. Writing recently in the Financial Times he says

“A competent lender of last resort –one who lends freely at a penalty rate against good collateral – actually turns a profit, as the IMF did in its response to the financial crises of the 1990s.”

However another noted economist and Summers’ Harvard colleague, Gregory Mankiw has a different take

“The fact that this particular bailout was profitable ex post is, however, scant evidence that it was wise ex ante.”

In fact, individual decisions could be well thought through and be a failure or vice versa.

Take the case of  Misbah-ul-Haq in the T20 final. His decision to go for the “Ashraful” (as Michael Slater calls the flick over fine leg – though it was actually Zimbabwe’s Douglas Marillier who actually played this shot for the first time in an international match) proved to be a failure, though the process of shot selection could not be faulted. Fine Leg was up and the shot was clearly on. Several batsmen (except for, maybe, Gautam Gambhir) had played it successfully and to good effect. The only flaw in the choice probably lay in the fact that he had not contended for the lack of pace in Joginder Sharma’s bowling.  Had the shot come off, Misbah would have been a hero and we may have had crowds vandalizing Joginder’s home back home in India.

In contrast Dhoni’s decision to toss the ball to Joginder is being considered a masterstroke. If you look at it dispassionately, it may not have been so. The first ball in the over was a wide, displaying nervousness on his part (in contrast to Misbah’s calm and collected attitude) and the others balls too were nothing to talk about. In fact the ball that got him the wicket was also a rank long hop. But then, who’s looking at it that way. All that matters is the end result.

So thin is the line between success and failure.

Coming back to the subject of bailouts and moral hazard, Summers’ lays out some general guidelines of when bailouts are fine. He places a strong case for public action if it does not impose costs on taxpayers and the problem has substantial contagion effects. Further, the problem should be that of liquidity alone and not relate to solvency.

On all these counts, the British action to bailout Northern Rock or even the Fed instigated bailout of LTCM a decade ago pass the test. Both these situations did not involve use of public funds (Northern’s deposits have been guaranteed by the British Government, but the guarantee has yet to be  invoked. In all probability Northern Rock will be sold to a willing buyer and will not require the use of public funds to ensure its survival.)

The same cannot be said of the decisions that our politicians take, though.  We keep bailing out banks, shielding petrol consumers from price rises, showering largesse on our successful cricketers (who after all are only doing their job) all at the cost of taxpayers. And we rarely hear a murmur of protest at these decisions, except for probably from hockey players, who also wish to enjoy the largesse from the government at the expense of the taxpayer.

August 4th, 2007

American Home Mortgage - RIP

American Home Mortgage, America’s 10th largest mortgage lender has announced that it will shut shop effective Friday. About 7000 workers lose their jobs.

When the history of this crisis is written, this would rank as a critical milestone, not Bear Stearns, not Blacksone, not KKR.

None of those 7000 persons probably did anything to deserve this. They remain victims of the environment, and the market system, which appears to display ruthlessness at times.

Update : AHM has now effectively shut down operations. More than 7000 workers are expected to lose their jobs.

July 5th, 2007
July 3rd, 2007

USA - Fiscal deficit of 67.69 bn $ in May’07

Situation

Fiscal deficit for the month of May’07 stood at -67.69 bn $

Fiscal deficit as a % of Real GDP stood at - 6.18% at the end of Q1 2007 ( Q1 always tends to have the worst fiscal situation as a % of GDP)

.

Background ( click on image for a larger visual)

  • The first two months of Q2 2007 show a surplus of 109.97 bn $.
  • As can be seen in the image the savings rate has steadily improved along with the improvement  in the fiscal situation
  •  .

     .

    Conclusion ( click on image for a larger visual)

    • Q2 always tends to have the best fiscal situation (Q2 for both 2005 and 2006 were at a fiscal surplus)
    • We can expect the surplus as a % of GDP to be to be towards a 4.50% for Q2 2007.

     .

     .

    Related links

    June 29th, 2007

    USA - Inflation (specially core) faces a rising risk

     

    Situation in May’07

    • On a monthly basis Consumer prices rose by 0.61 % (0.65 % in Apr’07)
    • On an annual basis Consumer prices rose by  2.69 % p.a ( 2.57 % p.a in Apr’07)

     

    • On a monthly basis Producer prices rose by 1.21 % (0.97 % in Apr’07)
    • On an annual basis Producer prices rose by 4.09 % p.a ( 3.17 % p.a in Apr ’07)

     

    • On an annual basis Core Consumer prices rose by  2.20 % p.a ( 2.30 % p.a in Apr’07)
    • On an annual basis Core Producer prices rose by  1.58% p.a ( 1.51 % p.a in Apr’07)

     

    Background

    .

    Core CPI viz Fed rate ( click on image for a clearer visual)

     

    The interest rate at 5.25% has helped in bringing down Core CPI.

     

     

    .

    CPI viz Core CPI ( click on image for a clearer visual)

     

     

    The direction of CPI tends to infuence the direction of Core CPI. CPI has been on a growth path since Oct’06. Core could follow.

     

    .

    PPI viz CPI ( click on image for a clearer visual)

     

     

    • The Fed has in its statement said that it feels that that inflation has been moderate in the first half of the year. It obviously is looking at core inflation, since normal CPI and PPI have been on a strong rising trend.
    • PPI growth looks unlikely to be beyond 4.50% p.a - 5.00% p.a
    • However the persistent sharp growth in PPI could drag CPI up towards the 3.5% - 4.00% p.a area

    ..

     

    Conclusion

    Unless we see a clear drop in Producer prices, it is very likely that the Fed fears on inflation could once again become “elevated” ( i.e rate hike )

     

    .

    Related links

    USA : No change in Fed rate - concerns remain on inflation

     

    Close
    E-mail It