Credit rating agency Fitch, today, downgraded bonds issued by ITI Limited, a (sick) Government of India owned telecom equipment manufacturer to default grade “D (Ind) (SO)”.
This, in itself, may not be much newsworthy, except for the fact that these bonds carried the highest possible rating “AAA (Ind) (SO)” prior to this downgrade to default category. The AAA rating had been assigned on the basis of an unconditional irrevocable guarantee given by the Government of India.
It appears that a few investors had opted to exercise their put option. These included a large (politically connected) residuary non banking finance company, a bank and a provident fund. However, there seems to be an inordinate delay in the repayment of principal leading to the downgrade by the rating agency.
This leads us to the question;
- Isn’t an unconditional, irrevocable guarantee as good as an obligation of the Government? Especially, since the defaulting entity is also owned by the government.
To my mind this is as good as a default by the government on debt denominated in (believe it or not) domestic currency. And this is a government which is proudly of its fiscal record.
Frankly, this is not the first time that the government has displayed such disregard for its contractual commitments to investors. We’ve had such instances in the past too.
Which leads me to another closely related issue;
Provident Funds are effectively forced to invest in such bonds, due to the statutory investment pattern. The statutory investment pattern is supposedly devised to eliminate such risks of default. On the contrary, provident funds have piled themselves with such and similar other junk debt. It’s another time bomb waiting to explode.
High time, our communist buddies understand and appreciate market realities and help in bringing about pension reform. Till such time, we are doomed with our retirement funds invested in such junk investments.
Update (May 25, 10 AM India Time) : The Times of India has some additional details. It appears that Canara Bank, the trustee to the bonds, have not invoked the guarantee. Now, that raises questions on trustee responsibility. Incidentally, Canara Bank is also owned by the Government.
It also appears that the folks at the Times of India read this blog. Notice the similarity in the language.
Share This